Peer Review

The selection of scientific papers using the "double blind" peer review system
The manuscripts submitted for presentation at the Conference on Comparative and International Law will be revised using the „double blind” peer review system, respecting international scientific standards. Thus, any scientific paper submitted will be reviewed by at least two reviewers with a national and international reputation in legal sciences. The review will be done on an anonymous basis (author's name is not communicated to the reviewers; reviewers name is not communicated to the author). If is necessary, the authors will receive recommendations and observations to improve the quality of their paper's content. It is possible to refuse the presentation of the scientific paper at conference to the proposal made by reviewers. 
The evaluation of the articles is done by the members of the Scientific Committee together with the external reviewers of the Conference on Comparative and International Law.
Rights and responsibilities of reviewers are presented in the Ethics and Malpractice Statement for Conference on Comparative and International Law.
The papers evaluation is performed by scientific reviewers using the Evaluation Form for the scientific papers submitted to the Conference on Comparative and International Law .
All who wish to acquire the honorable quality of scientific reviewer are invited to complete the Registration form for to acquire the quality of scientific reviewer of the Conference on Comparative and International Law .

President of the Organizing Committee
Associate professor CĂTĂLIN-SILVIU SĂRARU,
catalin.sararu@comparativelawconference.ro